@Armiansk1 @GarciaVictor_ @OlivierHertel @nicolasberrod @manellisophie la méta cochrane le disait déjà. je vois pas pouvoir ça aurait changé https://t.co/g1XSNn4Ghx
@ScabieuseLily @PublicEnem_y 🤣🤣🤣définition de troll pour un complotiste : celui qui lui amène la preuve qu'il dit des conneries https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@MediaKanto Ei, Anthony Fauci ei salannut, että hydroksiklorokiini olisi tehokas koronan hoidossa. Useat kontrolloidut tutkimukset osoittavat, että hydroksiklorokiini ei tehoa koronaa: https://t.co/d9qoc7O3o2 https://t.co/yjO9UXyhr0 https://t.co/NJxT1fx
@YvesPDB @EmmanuelMacron Macron a raison 🤷 https://t.co/3HJQp2sUTS
@andy_aotearoa @Wikipedia At the time that troll account was peddling paranoid nonsense about hydroxychloroquine, Wikipedia was posting accurate claims that held up with time. No wonder that non-expert crypto bro is mad at Wikipedia. 😁 https://t.co/YgFX2
@WendyOrent @Ayjchan You'll have to forgive the crypto edgelord. He just wants to feel special by disagreeing with people who know more than him, without him understanding the topics he's baselessly paranoid about. https://t.co/eMvv7eYxhl https://t.co/d
@simon_gordon_ Of course non-expert hydroxychloroquine lad has no idea of how science works. That's why his contrarianism gets things so wrong, while informed experts are more likely to get it right. https://t.co/ILscLeUrZz https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https
@SoonPlanet @olidarkside @silvano_trotta Mais c vrai que tout est validé. Raoult approche le record DU MONDE des publications rétractées 😏 https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
And those quoting a small Cochrane Collaboration Review https://t.co/1wbPWv79pL Anyone else noticed a change since Cochrane (Australia) received (trust busing) Gates money, booted the cofounder (Prof Peter Goetschze) & implanted a new chief? Was thei
@MartineRsx @richard72531800 @SyndicatSLS @Philippe_Parola @raoult_didier @louisfouch3 @CaudeHenrion @Pr_Chabriere_E @marseille_jeff @AnneliseBocquet @ErikLoridan @GregoryPamart @Dr_Steph_GAYET On a beau vous mettre les preuves que c'est faux, vous persist
@MartineRsx @richard72531800 @SyndicatSLS @Philippe_Parola @raoult_didier @louisfouch3 @CaudeHenrion @Pr_Chabriere_E @marseille_jeff @AnneliseBocquet @ErikLoridan @GregoryPamart @Dr_Steph_GAYET Le monde entier a testé l'HCQ pcq on ne pouvait pas croire que
@LaurentAragones @france_soir @raoult_didier Ça c'est parce t'es resté bloqué en 2020, depuis y'a eu qq autres études, hein !!🤡 https://t.co/9Pi3O8DqcK
@WiscguyNE @AlastairMcA30 Enjoy continuing to fall for an obvious disinformation website that uses retracted studies, misrepresents research, etc. You're a lost cause anyway. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/iRwgpmYOPg https://t.co/BKftWsFglC https://t.co/sszl5auHIr h
@WiscguyNE @AlastairMcA30 Re: "298 HCQ controlled studies say otherwise." https://t.co/JTEEOlXqDF Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2 either. Anyway, stay mad, bro. 🙂 https://t.co/YgFX2DTfmd [https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0] https://t.co/Nxy3Aw
@RidQuantumDrive @FlorianLemaitr5 La potion magique de Raoult n'a pas plus d'effet qu'un placebo ! Que de temps perdu ! https://t.co/JlEPo5yH3u https://t.co/PH3tdaOS8L https://t.co/pjNZ0F3oMR
@53v3n0fn1n3 @Sabisteb Garbage in, Garbage out? https://t.co/lGmIuoIBGn
@aaronshem @hausfath @ChrisMartzWX I read just fine. Greenhouse gas increases cause radiative forcing. That forcing causes feedbacks that increase shortwave absorption. Those feedbacks are included in estimates of GHG-induced warming used for TCR + ECS.
@real_seeking @Phillyguy413 @CbusCardGuy @JOEL9ONE Stop being disingenuous. https://t.co/Nxy3AwS7gA https://t.co/3m2jn4X0t3
RT @AlaryPatrick: @raoult_didier @BrokenTruthTV Je sais, ce n’est pas gentil… https://t.co/sHOB3tktTv https://t.co/OGAOeh73kS https://t.co/…
RT @AlaryPatrick: @raoult_didier @BrokenTruthTV Je sais, ce n’est pas gentil… https://t.co/sHOB3tktTv https://t.co/OGAOeh73kS https://t.co/…
@DuSoFabulous @ArtArie12 That's two hours wasted time.. ☹️ Again: False medical claims in video. Hydroxychloroquine has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID based on the results of many randomized controlled trials https://t.co/EPGzogNsJX
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
RT @FORCEPS4: ・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
・SARSはSARS-CoV-2とは異なるウイルス ・クロロキンはSARS-CoV-2感染症には効果なし それだけの話ですよ。 https://t.co/ueGgx02hlb https://t.co/qnfpK525cO
@BenMarble_MD Hydroxychloroquine is anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. Prophylaxis includes COVID-19 vaccines. https://t.co/eygyo3GQRq
@JulienFort4bis @fluidloading En 2024, on sort encore ce blog qui ment sur le résultat d'études, et met des méta-analyse au niveau de lettres à l'éditeur... Un méta-analyse, ça ressemble à ça : https://t.co/zezVM7sM5Q Et la conclusion est sans appel
@M_Alazon @OlivierAgos @marseille_jeff ou à cochrane https://t.co/4jg4sb0B9K
RT @ThomSkell: @JlsRet51206 @xazalbert @FrancoisFraiss1 @FrLecardonnel @wargonm @france_soir Les preuves de quoi? Que l'HCQ marche contre l…
@JlsRet51206 @xazalbert @FrancoisFraiss1 @FrLecardonnel @wargonm @france_soir Les preuves de quoi? Que l'HCQ marche contre le covid, comme le groupe CIA d'Azalbert/Raoult a voulu le faire croire en désinformation le public? Si je m'en réfère à des organism
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @BillyBostickson @CallumJCParr @flodebarre @franciscodeasis Again, your crank magnetism isn't going to work on HCQ, lab…
@BillyBostickson @CallumJCParr @flodebarre @franciscodeasis Again, your crank magnetism isn't going to work on HCQ, lab leak, etc. HCQ doesn't work. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/2YWLQOR0YB https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/QfWd7dTaKl
@BillyBostickson @Ticklicker56 @ChrisShaver64 @gtuckerkellogg You spamming that isn't bringing HCQ any closer to working, nor fixing your crank magnetism on HCQ, lab leak, etc. 🤷♂️ https://t.co/YgFX2DTfmd https://t.co/cURfACSR3B https://t.co/N3ntRtmHPn
@BillyBostickson @Ticklicker56 @ChrisShaver64 @gtuckerkellogg You can spam as much as you want. HCQ still doesn't work. https://t.co/DMkwLTjUM0 https://t.co/mdqvkAY9AW https://t.co/ingSNJCgmQ
@BillyBostickson @ChrisShaver64 @Ticklicker56 @gtuckerkellogg HCQ doesn't work, nor does your crank magnetism that you displayed on HCQ, lab leak, etc. https://t.co/YgFX2DTNbL https://t.co/cURfACSR3B https://t.co/bKPBrn8n48
@BillyBostickson @ChrisShaver64 @Ticklicker56 @gtuckerkellogg Was this before or after you ran around pretending hydroxychloroquine worked, as if you knew better than informed experts (much as you do on lab leak)? https://t.co/LeoTMCqB0y https://t.co/Nxy3
@Sangha40409046 @SudRadio @SabrinaRoubache @raoult_didier 4 ans... faut vous renseigner, pas juste écouter les contes de fées https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@Laji47434792 @ClaudeSteve6 @Sonic_urticant @laprovence Je peux vous donner des sources scientifiques. Je sais que ça ne changera rien: les soutiens de Raoult et autres ont trouvé un argument magique, toute étude qui les embête vient de vendus à Big pharma
@Sebasti27592176 @laprovence ... allons-y, ce sera + intéressant. Qu'est-ce qui vous permet de dire que ça marche alors que des revues scientifiques de référence disent l'inverse, par ex Cochrane, validée par Raoult ? https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja Plenty of meaningful trials were done. They showed it didn't work. It was "politicized" insofar as non-expert contrarian ideologues like you made up whatever you wanted about it to suit your preferred narrativ
@aaronshem @priscian @JimBowersclimb @curryja No, what's fake is the notion you promoted that hydroxychloroquine works for SARS-CoV-2, non-expert contrarian ideologue. Anyway, let folks know when you've learned how to calculate a *trend*. https://t.co/3l
@priscian @aaronshem @JimBowersclimb @curryja aaronshem isn't going to accept that since they're as much a tedious contrarian on climate science as they are on COVID-19. https://t.co/3lazEMtemF
@daniel_corcos @kellywind @_everythingism @VaughnMises @LeviTD @gadboit I see you failed to grasp that the same logic applies to each. FYI: HCQ doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2. Maybe stop bringing your same failed contrarian reasoning to topic after topic.
@daniel_corcos @kellywind @_everythingism @VaughnMises @LeviTD @gadboit It's your baseless paranoia. Folks might continue testing a failed drug in randomized trials, even though that can be unethical. Hence why warnings are given against that. So no, a dr
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
RT @Nopanaden: @AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) htt…
@AngelGarciaMon8 Aquí tiene información al respecto. Un saludo. 1) https://t.co/WjEw1gSHvd 2) https://t.co/AYsJVKMSFl 3) https://t.co/i5Vj7lop8c 4) https://t.co/c6qA7AZCo5 5) https://t.co/Y9sn2Us37I 6) https://t.co/0MJE61lCKc 7) https://t.co/wEsu31zzFl
@refusen05766521 @spunkmonkey1 @JamieBranagan @MichaelRosenYes Based on the evidence to date, IVM is not effective. HCQ likely to cause more harm and also ineffective at treating / preventing Covid. https://t.co/35SGvxIrjP https://t.co/CA02Kcsel2
@JSegor For posterity: 1) Hydroxychloroquine didn't work. 2) Campbell was a charlatan. https://t.co/YZlfCIlPWi https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/z8OMdDx2ho
35/J https://t.co/xORASc7jk9 https://t.co/YgFX2DTfmd https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 It's morbidly ironic seeing Curry delete the places where she peddled paranoid nonsense on hydroxychloroquine, that was part of the 'groupthink' of her contrarian crowd: 🧐 htt
34/J https://t.co/KoOkRGIwL1 https://t.co/96hnQn51ag https://t.co/eMvv7eYxhl Curry deleted this, along with her tweet mentioning it, lest anyone anyone place that alongside apt expert warnings on hydroxychloroquine: 🧐 https://t.co/1aUxVcvj3j https://t
@kellywind @hypoautonomic @emilyakopp @flodebarre @_everythingism Ivermectin produces the results one would expect of a drug that doesn't work for SARS-CoV-2. @MoNscience had more expertise in evaluating the evidence that you did, and I thank him for corr
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @_everythingism @past_is_future Same paranoid delusion he applied to hydroxychloroquine, herd immunity by October 2020,…
@_everythingism @past_is_future Same paranoid delusion he applied to hydroxychloroquine, herd immunity by October 2020, etc. But now continued on lab leak. And he simply refuses to see the problems with it. 🤪 https://t.co/mRbGJMC2tg https://t.co/j6fnCuW
@_everythingism @past_is_future Re: "Let’s talk about untrustworthy reporting shall we" https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 So untrustworthy it was deleted: https://t.co/Y3cyKy7OYL https://t.co/KTPrOSZnCy
@apocalypsurfer @past_is_future Probably thought hydroxychloroquine worked because he saw tweets that got lots of likes saying that it did. He's a crackpot. https://t.co/1bCPDPs9sf https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/GuzD07N5t6
@ChristiaanPtr @past_is_future You'll have to forgive the non-expert hydroxychloroquine lad. His baseless non-expert contrarianism leaps from topic to topic. https://t.co/Nxy3AwRzr2 https://t.co/abi3IJZt8N https://t.co/EgqsoukFcL
@VigilantFox Not using ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) hasn't killed anyone, but rather the opposite. Results of randomized controlled trials: Ivermectin and HCQ are inefficient in treating or preventing COVID: https://t.co/kGIcgTZ96x https://t.co
@VigilantFox The CDC advocated hydroxychloroquine for malaria, not COVID-19. A drug working for malaria is not proof of efficacy against COVID-19. Hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 actually increases the mortality. https://t.co/Lil8bgbryJ
@Maitre_Eolas @Olivierfente @raoult_didier @PavanVincent Il suffit de quatre secondes de votre vie pour lire ceci : "Hydroxychloroquine caused more unwanted effects than a placebo treatment, though it did not appear to increase the number of serious unwant
Chloroquine ou hydroxychloroquine dans la prévention et le traitement de la COVID‐19 https://t.co/qo1mqwaCl6 https://t.co/oguSzwYdsN
@Woodynist @lonnibesancon @AdolfoRamirezJ2 @xazalbert Même Dede Raoult clame que COCHRANE est LA Rolls des publications scientifiques -> https://t.co/aCyAvlLLXT?
@ChristinePadych @vallou88758970 @raoult_didier @CaudeHenrion Raoultix - le même qui clame que COCHRANE est LA ROlls des publications scientifiques -> https://t.co/nzjhYSj3r6
@uTobian @RickABright Because it's produced by an anonymous group. Meanwhile, the WHO does not recommend using HCQ nor does the Mayo Clinic and this Cochrane (highly regarded) analysis of large trials shows no effect https://t.co/Huqq3A5fWM
@Woodynist @OlivierOpg @MathieuMolimard @Reseau_CRPV @D_Deplanque @FlorianLemaitr5 Vous avez raison. C'est même un peu la spécialité de Cochrane. https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@barriere_dr @Arcom_fr @PascalPraud @CNEWS Même Dede Raoult clame que COCHRANE est LA Rolls des publications scientifiques -> https://t.co/aCyAvlLLXT?
@landryphilippe3 @lionel_case “Très majoritairement favorables” 🤡 https://t.co/NsynUsxqaJ
@Eltoboso1605 @Tournalin @barriere_dr @raoult_didier Et il est démontré dans de nombreuses études que l'hydroxy chloroquine ne soigne pas le covid. Déjà en 2021 on le savait, si vous avez la capacité scientifique et anglophone à lire ça https://t.co/6v2N
@Ihamessou1 @JBadetti @Liebodar @nicolasberrod Ouah, t'es trop fort. Ben il faudra penser à écrire à Cochrane... attends 🤔 J'parie que tu vas me dire qu'ils sont corrompus 😜. Même pas une petite mention de c19study, comme raoult ?https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@aaronshem @hausfath @lmabnranger Your non-expert ideologically-motivated contrarianism is rather tedious + 'junk'. https://t.co/7Q79qe9cJU https://t.co/3lazEMtemF https://t.co/vi1G1qGvgk
@Pedro4056383607 @EthicZet @RoghiJeanLouis @AlexisPhilo @AnneIbiza13 Cette review utilise et source 30 études, aucune ne venant de Lancet. J'ai cherché a trouver la même chose montrant l'efficacité de la choroquine mais introuvable. https://t.co/XKPKIYfFL
@Lionmojah @ben_oit @Tipuncho @SophiaAram @franceinter Même Raoultix clame que Cochrane est LA Rolls des publications scientifiques ⤵️ https://t.co/SGfUB7UPSE
@gegebiag @AlexisPhilo J'aurais préféré que le traitement soit efficace.. Mais l'efficacité d'un traitement ne se décrète pas.. Aucun effet même in vitro sur cellules de poumon humain ou sur le macaque.. https://t.co/y09v9wVljo
@breel_m @Yashn37 @SpellMim @lonnibesancon @Beatrice_Rosen C'est toi qui tourne en rond https://t.co/DegTXlfJKp
@sharkzfanz Cochrane Review: https://t.co/d8ShYT8Pbj
@Tartoquetsches1 @MrHxC2 @GuillaumeRozier Last but not least: Dede Raoult clame lui-même que Cochrane est LA Rolls des publications scientifiques -> https://t.co/aCyAvlLLXT?
@GuillaumeManza3 @D_Deplanque @france_soir @raoult_didier @verity_france @Marc_Doyer @SFPT_fr @Sante_Gouv @MathieuMolimard Ah forcément, une étude de l’IHU cosignée par le patron… Sinon, voilà la valeur de cette étude comme celle de l’étude initiale :
@OncleLucifer @LauLauRette2432 @fluidloading Oh bah rien ⬇️ https://t.co/AoC2oI7qii
@P_McCulloughMD Liar. McCullough's protocol has not proven efficacy in humans. Multiple randomized controlled trials confirm Hydroxychloroquine has no efficacy to treat or prevent COVID https://t.co/WX5vkzhSf3 https://t.co/AQEDya2tp9
@HoraEst2022 Ook al is dat advies nadien nog bevestigd (https://t.co/U9IDyUiRAX) en kwam er ook nog deze boodschap om even goed over na te denken (en het genadeschot voor de in desinformatie gelovende wappies) : https://t.co/W9f9PqFfQG
@zirealvipi @Tsarorius @RemondAlex4 @Runningdoge5 @CaptainMedical @finstreet Bon alors c'est super simple: https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
RT @AndreasHuysman: Omdat dit weer circuleert: HCQ werkt niet. Vertrouw op studies van hoge kwaliteit, niet op screenshots van oude tweets…
Omdat dit weer circuleert: HCQ werkt niet. Vertrouw op studies van hoge kwaliteit, niet op screenshots van oude tweets zonder context. https://t.co/ub8yUx4xMW https://t.co/LdTekktELe https://t.co/jNRqczCrF8
@LehmannDrC @libe Avez-vous pensé à en informer Cochrane ? https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5
@zirealvipi @RemondAlex4 @Runningdoge5 @CaptainMedical @finstreet Cet article date de 2020. Pour le fond, on a maintenant tout ce qu'il faut. https://t.co/JzITHMF8f5