↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effectiveness and adverse effects of D‐cycloserine compared with placebo on social and communication skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
The effectiveness and adverse effects of D‐cycloserine compared with placebo on social and communication skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013457.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swe Zin Aye, Han Ni, Htwe H Sein, San T Mon, Qishi Zheng, Yoko Kin Yoke Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Master 23 11%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 12 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 96 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 21%
Psychology 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Unspecified 7 3%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 99 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,444,877
of 26,230,991 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,785
of 13,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,364
of 558,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#102
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,230,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 558,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.