↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effectiveness and adverse effects of D‐cycloserine compared with placebo on social and communication skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
The effectiveness and adverse effects of D‐cycloserine compared with placebo on social and communication skills in individuals with autism spectrum disorder
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013457.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Swe Zin Aye, Han Ni, Htwe H Sein, San T Mon, Qishi Zheng, Yoko Kin Yoke Wong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Master 19 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 11 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 85 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 21%
Psychology 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Unspecified 9 5%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 89 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,196,397
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,647
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,784
of 551,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 551,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.