↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Needling for encapsulated trabeculectomy filtering blebs

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Needling for encapsulated trabeculectomy filtering blebs
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003658.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Feyi‐Waboso, Henry OD Ejere

Abstract

Encapsulation of a filtering bleb following trabeculectomy may lead to elevation of intraocular pressure, prompting further medical or surgical intervention. It has been suggested that needling of an encapsulated bleb may be effective in re-establishing drainage and lowering intraocular pressure.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 90 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 31 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Computer Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 33 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,868
of 186,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#138
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.