↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
Title
Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012968.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anjolie Chhabra, Apala Roy Chowdhury, Hemanshu Prabhakar, Rajeshwari Subramaniam, Mahesh Kumar Arora, Anurag Srivastava, Mani Kalaivani

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 13 7%
Researcher 13 7%
Student > Master 12 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 97 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 104 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#6,438,667
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,857
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,673
of 451,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.