↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 -agonist in one inhaler versus long-acting beta2 -agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Combined corticosteroid and long-acting beta2 -agonist in one inhaler versus long-acting beta2 -agonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006829.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luis Javier Nannini, Toby J Lasserson, Phillippa Poole

Abstract

Both inhaled steroids (ICS) and long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABA) are used in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This updated review compared compound LABA plus ICS therapy (LABA/ICS) with the LABA component drug given alone.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 254 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 22 8%
Other 60 23%
Unknown 41 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 138 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 48 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,720,043
of 18,659,856 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,124
of 11,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,691
of 159,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,659,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.