↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006193.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilberto Yoshinobu Nakama, Maria Stella Peccin, Gustavo JM Almeida, Ozório de Almeida Lira Neto, Antônio AB Queiroz, Ricardo Dizioli Navarro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 323 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 17%
Researcher 41 12%
Student > Bachelor 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Other 26 8%
Other 79 24%
Unknown 61 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Engineering 15 5%
Unspecified 14 4%
Psychology 10 3%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 78 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,359,916
of 20,653,890 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,266
of 12,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,600
of 168,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,653,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.