↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
78 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
313 Mendeley
Title
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000032.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Gillies, Anna Kearney, Ciara Keenan, Shaun Treweek, Jemma Hudson, Valerie C Brueton, Thomas Conway, Andrew Hunter, Louise Murphy, Peter J Carr, Greta Rait, Paul Manson, Magaly Aceves-Martins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 311 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Student > Master 35 11%
Researcher 30 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 8%
Other 13 4%
Other 39 12%
Unknown 135 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Psychology 14 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 149 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#651,020
of 24,848,516 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,234
of 12,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,510
of 427,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,848,516 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.