↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
71 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000032.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie Gillies, Anna Kearney, Ciara Keenan, Shaun Treweek, Jemma Hudson, Valerie C Brueton, Thomas Conway, Andrew Hunter, Louise Murphy, Peter J Carr, Greta Rait, Paul Manson, Magaly Aceves-Martins

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Psychology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#536,239
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,178
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,777
of 311,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.