↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012553.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shayesteh Jahanfar, Jacqueline J Ho, Sharifah Halimah Jaafar, Iosief Abraha, Mohaddesseh Noura, Cassandra R Ross, Mohan Pammi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Unspecified 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Librarian 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 38 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Unspecified 4 5%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 40 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,605,468
of 23,372,207 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,553
of 12,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,281
of 423,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,372,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.