↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acupuncture and dry‐needling for low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
22 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
58 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
379 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
519 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Acupuncture and dry‐needling for low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001351.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea D Furlan, Maurits W van Tulder, Dan Cherkin, Hiroshi Tsukayama, Lixing Lao, Bart W Koes, Brian M Berman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 509 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 120 23%
Student > Master 86 17%
Student > Postgraduate 43 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 7%
Other 32 6%
Other 100 19%
Unknown 103 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 215 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 88 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Psychology 15 3%
Social Sciences 13 3%
Other 52 10%
Unknown 118 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#157,568
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#272
of 13,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188
of 162,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.