↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
60 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 569 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 140 23%
Student > Bachelor 96 16%
Researcher 53 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 9%
Other 52 9%
Other 132 22%
Unknown 75 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 263 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 108 18%
Sports and Recreations 23 4%
Psychology 21 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 66 11%
Unknown 102 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#189,882
of 19,152,115 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#345
of 11,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,886
of 367,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,152,115 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.