↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
638 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 638 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 607 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 141 22%
Student > Bachelor 104 16%
Researcher 53 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 8%
Other 51 8%
Other 140 22%
Unknown 96 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 262 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 118 18%
Sports and Recreations 24 4%
Psychology 22 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 70 11%
Unknown 124 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#247,849
of 22,811,321 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#409
of 12,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#778
of 106,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,811,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.