↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
685 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low‐back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008112.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sidney M Rubinstein, Marienke van Middelkoop, Willem JJ Assendelft, Michiel R de Boer, Maurits W van Tulder

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 685 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
Germany 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 654 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 141 21%
Student > Bachelor 111 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 8%
Other 53 8%
Researcher 52 8%
Other 142 21%
Unknown 131 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 265 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 127 19%
Sports and Recreations 25 4%
Psychology 22 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Other 68 10%
Unknown 160 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 157. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2024.
All research outputs
#273,361
of 26,220,821 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#439
of 13,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#822
of 120,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,220,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.