↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Manual material handling advice and assistive devices for preventing and treating back pain in workers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005958.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos H Verbeek, Kari-Pekka Martimo, Jaro Karppinen, P Paul FM Kuijer, Eira Viikari-Juntura, Esa-Pekka Takala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 18%
Student > Bachelor 37 17%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 37 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Psychology 15 7%
Engineering 13 6%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 51 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#848,268
of 17,483,393 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,210
of 11,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,898
of 286,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,483,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.