| Title |
Thoracic imaging tests for the diagnosis of COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013639.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nayaar Islam, Sanam Ebrahimzadeh, Jean-Paul Salameh, Sakib Kazi, Nicholas Fabiano, Lee Treanor, Marissa Absi, Zachary Hallgrimson, Mariska MG Leeflang, Lotty Hooft, Christian B van der Pol, Ross Prager, Samanjit S Hare, Carole Dennie, René Spijker, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Kevin Jenniskens, Daniël A Korevaar, Jérémie F Cohen, Ann Van den Bruel, Yemisi Takwoingi, Janneke van de Wijgert, Johanna AAG Damen, Junfeng Wang, Matthew DF McInnes, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 14% |
| Canada | 11 | 14% |
| Mexico | 6 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 66% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 22% |
| Scientists | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 551 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 551 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 6% |
| Researcher | 24 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 60 | 11% |
| Unknown | 338 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 4% |
| Engineering | 18 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 44 | 8% |
| Unknown | 352 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#746,225
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,381
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,332
of 457,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.