↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Homoeopathy for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
131 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Homoeopathy for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline A Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 172 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 9 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 54 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 55 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#306,607
of 26,332,460 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#497
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228
of 57,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,332,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.