↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Homoeopathy for induction of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
129 tweeters
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages
video
4 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Homoeopathy for induction of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline A Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 13 9%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 36 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#252,743
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#423
of 12,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180
of 52,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.