| Title |
Intercessory prayer for the alleviation of ill health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000368.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leanne Roberts, Irshad Ahmed, Andrew Davison |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 13% |
| Russia | 11 | 8% |
| United States | 9 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 61 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 83% |
| Scientists | 12 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 335 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 322 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 11% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 82 | 24% |
| Unknown | 74 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 31% |
| Psychology | 46 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 45 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#145,990
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#265
of 12,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273
of 97,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.