↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Imaging modalities to inform the detection and diagnosis of early caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014545
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanya Walsh, Richard Macey, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Falk Schwendicke, Helen V Worthington, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts, Ting-Li Su, Anita Sengupta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 10 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Researcher 8 4%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 97 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 102 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,365,049
of 25,543,275 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,916
of 13,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,489
of 453,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 167 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,543,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 167 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.