↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013732.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Bellù, Olga Romantsik, Chiara Nava, Koert A de Waal, Rinaldo Zanini, Matteo Bruschettini

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 6%
Student > Master 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Researcher 11 5%
Unspecified 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 120 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Unspecified 11 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 125 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,058,509
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,080
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,109
of 470,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.