| Title |
Chinese herbal medicines for hypercholesterolemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008305.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhao Lan Liu, Jian Ping Liu, Anthony Lin Zhang, Qiong Wu, Yao Ruan, George Lewith, Denise Visconte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 70 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 4% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 80 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,106,224
of 25,534,033 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,876
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,094
of 127,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,534,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.