↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 11,741)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
Title
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006207.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Jefferson, Chris B Del Mar, Liz Dooley, Eliana Ferroni, Lubna A Al-Ansary, Ghada A Bawazeer, Mieke L van Driel, N Sreekumaran Nair, Mark A Jones, Sarah Thorning, John M Conly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,790 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 630 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 101 16%
Researcher 95 15%
Student > Bachelor 91 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 9%
Other 44 7%
Other 125 20%
Unknown 121 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 214 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 11%
Social Sciences 24 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 3%
Psychology 21 3%
Other 118 19%
Unknown 164 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,920
of 17,729,196 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 11,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164
of 298,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,729,196 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.