↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 13,156)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
386 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
694 Mendeley
Title
Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006207.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Jefferson, Chris B Del Mar, Liz Dooley, Eliana Ferroni, Lubna A Al‐Ansary, Ghada A Bawazeer, Mieke L van Driel, N Sreekumaran Nair, Mark A Jones, Sarah Thorning, John M Conly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26,002 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 694 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 689 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 105 15%
Researcher 103 15%
Student > Bachelor 91 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 9%
Other 42 6%
Other 131 19%
Unknown 163 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 215 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 73 11%
Social Sciences 28 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Psychology 23 3%
Other 127 18%
Unknown 203 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#180
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 128,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.