↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Reduced dietary salt for the prevention of cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in this source, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
40 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Reduced dietary salt for the prevention of cardiovascular disease
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taylor, Rod S, Ashton, Kate E, Moxham, Tiffany, Hooper, Lee, Ebrahim, Shah

Abstract

An earlier Cochrane review of dietary advice identified insufficient evidence to assess effects of reduced salt intake on mortality or cardiovascular events. 1. To assess the long term effects of interventions aimed at reducing dietary salt on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity.2. To investigate whether blood pressure reduction is an explanatory factor in any effect of such dietary interventions on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effect (DARE)), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycInfo were searched through to October 2008. References of included studies and reviews were also checked. No language restrictions were applied. Trials fulfilled the following criteria: (1) randomised with follow up of at least six-months, (2) intervention was reduced dietary salt (restricted salt dietary intervention or advice to reduce salt intake), (3) adults, (4) mortality or cardiovascular morbidity data was available. Two reviewers independently assessed whether studies met these criteria. Data extraction and study validity were compiled by a single reviewer, and checked by a second. Authors were contacted where possible to obtain missing information. Events were extracted and relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs calculated. Seven studies (including 6,489 participants) met the inclusion criteria - three in normotensives (n=3518), two in hypertensives (n=758), one in a mixed population of normo- and hypertensives (n=1981) and one in heart failure (n=232) with end of trial follow-up of seven to 36 months and longest observational follow up (after trial end) to 12.7 yrs. Relative risks for all cause mortality in normotensives (end of trial RR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.40 to 1.12, 60 deaths; longest follow up RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.40, 79 deaths) and hypertensives (end of trial RR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.13, 513 deaths; longest follow up RR 0.96, 95% CI; 0.83 to 1.11, 565 deaths) showed no strong evidence of any effect of salt reduction. Cardiovascular morbidity in people with normal blood pressure (longest follow-up RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.20, 200 events) or raised blood pressure at baseline (end of trial RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.57 to 1.23, 93 events) also showed no strong evidence of benefit. Salt restriction increased the risk of all-cause death in those with congestive heart failure (end of trial relative risk: 2.59, 95% 1.04 to 6.44, 21 deaths). We found no information on participants health-related quality of life. Despite collating more event data than previous systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (665 deaths in some 6,250 participants), there is still insufficient power to exclude clinically important effects of reduced dietary salt on mortality or cardiovascular morbidity in normotensive or hypertensive populations. Further RCT evidence is needed to confirm whether restriction of sodium is harmful for people with heart failure. Our estimates of benefits from dietary salt restriction are consistent with the predicted small effects on clinical events attributable to the small blood pressure reduction achieved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
New Zealand 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 147 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 31 20%