↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
378 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
447 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001096.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaveh G Shojania, Alison Jennings, Craig R Ramsay, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Janice L Kwan, Lisha Lo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 447 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 418 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 84 19%
Student > Master 73 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 14%
Other 32 7%
Student > Bachelor 28 6%
Other 97 22%
Unknown 70 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 9%
Social Sciences 37 8%
Psychology 35 8%
Computer Science 16 4%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 91 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,170,066
of 19,862,278 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,855
of 11,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,856
of 322,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,862,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.