↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
404 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The effects of on-screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001096.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kaveh G Shojania, Alison Jennings, Alain Mayhew, Craig R Ramsay, Martin P Eccles, Jeremy Grimshaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 3%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 375 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 81 20%
Student > Master 67 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 15%
Other 30 7%
Student > Bachelor 26 6%
Other 88 22%
Unknown 51 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 155 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 10%
Psychology 35 9%
Social Sciences 35 9%
Computer Science 15 4%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 70 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,333,941
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,399
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,220
of 195,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.