↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mistletoe therapy in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
27 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
Title
Mistletoe therapy in oncology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Horneber, Gerd van Ackeren, Klaus Linde, Matthias Rostock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 271 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 20%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 7%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 9%
Psychology 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 58 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2021.
All research outputs
#249,269
of 17,873,421 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#508
of 11,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,154
of 316,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,873,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.