↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Mistletoe therapy in oncology

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
35 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
177 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
Title
Mistletoe therapy in oncology
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003297.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Horneber, Gerd van Ackeren, Klaus Linde, Matthias Rostock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 319 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 17%
Researcher 49 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Other 68 20%
Unknown 67 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 9%
Psychology 15 5%
Unspecified 11 3%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 77 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#294,246
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#501
of 12,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#411
of 67,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.