↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
29 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
High versus standard volume enteral feeds to promote growth in preterm or low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012413.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thangaraj Abiramalatha, Niranjan Thomas, Sivam Thanigainathan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 32 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 32 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,072,772
of 21,419,046 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,521
of 12,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,391
of 327,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,419,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.