↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
275 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
565 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Flodgren, Martin P Eccles, Sasha Shepperd, Anthony Scott, Elena Parmelli, Fiona R Beyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 565 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 2%
Canada 7 1%
United States 5 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 535 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 124 22%
Researcher 104 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 13%
Student > Bachelor 46 8%
Other 33 6%
Other 120 21%
Unknown 62 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 195 35%
Social Sciences 76 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 38 7%
Psychology 37 7%
Other 88 16%
Unknown 87 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2020.
All research outputs
#283,147
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#598
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,462
of 193,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.