| Title |
An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009255 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gerd Flodgren, Martin P Eccles, Sasha Shepperd, Anthony Scott, Elena Parmelli, Fiona R Beyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Chile | 1 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 9% |
| Mexico | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 668 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 1% |
| Canada | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 638 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 134 | 20% |
| Researcher | 117 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 6% |
| Other | 138 | 21% |
| Unknown | 100 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 212 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 80 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 55 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 43 | 6% |
| Psychology | 40 | 6% |
| Other | 113 | 17% |
| Unknown | 125 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#422,816
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#781
of 12,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,451
of 117,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.