↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009255
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerd Flodgren, Martin P Eccles, Sasha Shepperd, Anthony Scott, Elena Parmelli, Fiona R Beyer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 1%
Canada 7 1%
United States 5 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 605 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 131 21%
Researcher 116 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 13%
Student > Bachelor 52 8%
Other 39 6%
Other 129 20%
Unknown 88 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 207 33%
Social Sciences 79 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 55 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 41 6%
Psychology 39 6%
Other 102 16%
Unknown 112 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#384,810
of 22,029,478 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#716
of 12,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,076
of 329,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,029,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.