↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, James Adams, Tariq Z Ali, Alison M MacLeod, Luke Vale, June D Cody, Sheila A Wallace, Conal Daly

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 17%
Student > Master 21 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Psychology 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 30 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,425,786
of 19,069,422 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,051
of 11,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,965
of 322,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,069,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.