↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end‐stage renal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end‐stage renal disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, James Adams, Tariq Z Ali, Alison M MacLeod, Luke Vale, June D Cody, Sheila A Wallace, Conal Daly

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Brunei Darussalam 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 61 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 64 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,430,408
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,035
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,038
of 87,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.