↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Motivational interviewing for substance abuse

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
315 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
523 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Motivational interviewing for substance abuse
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008063.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geir Smedslund, Rigmor C Berg, Karianne T Hammerstrøm, Asbjørn Steiro, Kari A Leiknes, Helene M Dahl, Kjetil Karlsen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 523 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 502 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 102 20%
Researcher 85 16%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 8%
Student > Postgraduate 37 7%
Other 106 20%
Unknown 95 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 26%
Psychology 114 22%
Social Sciences 54 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 2%
Other 46 9%
Unknown 119 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#891,948
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,914
of 12,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,361
of 111,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.