↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for integrating primary health services in low- and middle-income countries at the point of delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
754 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategies for integrating primary health services in low- and middle-income countries at the point of delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Dudley, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 754 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 729 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 154 20%
Researcher 140 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 10%
Student > Bachelor 55 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 7%
Other 152 20%
Unknown 129 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 257 34%
Social Sciences 92 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 87 12%
Psychology 36 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 3%
Other 101 13%
Unknown 155 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,601,488
of 22,381,487 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,671
of 12,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,535
of 101,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,381,487 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.