↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for integrating primary health services in low- and middle-income countries at the point of delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Strategies for integrating primary health services in low- and middle-income countries at the point of delivery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003318.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lilian Dudley, Paul Garner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Papua New Guinea 1 1%
Uganda 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 88 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 24%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 25 26%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 46%
Social Sciences 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 13 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,446,288
of 17,730,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,625
of 11,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,677
of 302,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,730,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.