Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Jing Guo, Chunjie Li, Qifeng Zhang, Gang Wu, Scott A Deacon, Jianwei Chen, Haikun Hu, Shujuan Zou, Qingsong Ye
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||4||57%|
|Members of the public||2||29%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||47||16%|
|Student > Postgraduate||42||14%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||27||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||27||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||164||54%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||12||4%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 12,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 114,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.