↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008050.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Guo, Chunjie Li, Qifeng Zhang, Gang Wu, Scott A Deacon, Jianwei Chen, Haikun Hu, Shujuan Zou, Qingsong Ye

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 16%
Student > Postgraduate 40 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 7%
Other 62 23%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Engineering 7 3%
Psychology 4 1%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 64 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,619,596
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,013
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,600
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.