The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008050.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Guo, Chunjie Li, Qifeng Zhang, Gang Wu, Scott A Deacon, Jianwei Chen, Haikun Hu, Shujuan Zou, Qingsong Ye |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 41 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 21% |
| Unknown | 94 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 166 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Engineering | 8 | 2% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 6% |
| Unknown | 108 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,673,140
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,183
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,235
of 128,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.