↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Epinephrine for bronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Epinephrine for bronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003123.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Hartling, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, David W Johnson, Amy C Plint, Terry P Klassen, Hema Patel, Ricardo M Fernandes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 2%
Other 2 1%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Student > Postgraduate 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 128 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Psychology 1 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Unknown 128 94%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,366,836
of 18,999,792 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,378
of 11,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,422
of 323,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,999,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.