| Title |
Epinephrine for bronchiolitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003123.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Hartling, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, David W Johnson, Amy C Plint, Terry P Klassen, Hema Patel, Ricardo M Fernandes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 9% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 9% |
| Japan | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 2% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | <1% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 123 | 90% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 91% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,913,382
of 24,544,893 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,195
of 12,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,409
of 117,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,544,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,930 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,735 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.