↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Humidified air inhalation for treating croup

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Humidified air inhalation for treating croup
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002870.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Moore, Paul Little

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 19%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 49%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 16 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2011.
All research outputs
#13,873,923
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,733
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,896
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.