↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pre-operative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Pre-operative biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005444.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Fang, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Qin Wang, Brian R Davidson, He Lin, Xiaodong Xie, Chaohua Wang

Abstract

Patients with obstructive jaundice have various pathophysiological changes that affect the liver, kidney, heart, and the immune system. There is considerable controversy as to whether temporary relief of biliary obstruction prior to major definitive surgery (pre-operative biliary drainage) is of any benefit to the patient.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 20 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 27 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#6,788,869
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,096
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,401
of 142,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#51
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.