↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antifibrinolytic amino acids for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute or chronic liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antifibrinolytic amino acids for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with acute or chronic liver disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martí-Carvajal AJ, Solà I, Martí-Carvajal PI, Martí-Carvajal, Arturo J, Solà, Ivan, Martí-Carvajal, Pedro I

Abstract

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the most frequent causes of morbidity and mortality in the course of liver cirrhosis. Patients with liver disease frequently have haemostatic abnormalities like hyperfibrinolysis. Therefore, antifibrinolytic amino acids have been proposed to be used as supplementary interventions alongside any of the primary treatments for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver diseases.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 13%
United Kingdom 1 7%
United States 1 7%
Brazil 1 7%
Unknown 10 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Other 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 67%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,562,097
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,617
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,757
of 124,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.