↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012862.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Pugh, Eoin D O'Sullivan, Fiona Ai Duthie, Philip Masson, David Kavanagh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 131 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Unspecified 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 62 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Unspecified 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 67 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,503,496
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,975
of 13,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,821
of 458,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.