↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for ulcerative colitis: Outcomes in low volume hospitals versus high volume hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for ulcerative colitis: Outcomes in low volume hospitals versus high volume hospitals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010175
Authors

Sarah E Moore, Manoj J Raval, Terry P Phang, Brian Bressler, Carl J Brown

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Unknown 10 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2012.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,572
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#191
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.