↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013122.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Lawrence MJ Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Danielle Roberts, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton, Davide Roccarina, Amine Benmassaoud, Laura Iogna Prat, Norman R Williams, Mario Csenar, Dominic Fritche, Tanjia Begum, Sivapatham Arunan, Maxine Tapp, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 20%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 25%
Unspecified 8 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 14 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2021.
All research outputs
#13,460,063
of 20,832,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,355
of 12,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,906
of 330,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,832,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.