| Title |
Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta‐analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013122.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Corina Plaz Torres, Lawrence Mj Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Danielle Roberts, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton, Davide Roccarina, Amine Benmassaoud, Laura Iogna Prat, Norman R Williams, Mario Csenar, Dominic Fritche, Tanjia Begum, Sivapatham Arunan, Maxine Tapp, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,194,194
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,239
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,615
of 455,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#152
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.