↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007179.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reza Yousefi-Nooraie, Sameh Mortaz-Hejri, Mehdi Mehrani, Parham Sadeghipour

Abstract

Brucellosis is the most common zoonotic infection in the world. Several antibiotics, separately or in combination, have been tried for treatment of human brucellosis. The inconsistencies between different treatment regimens warrants the need for a systematic review to inform clinical practice and future research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 145 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 40 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 45 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,625,680
of 20,310,861 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,216
of 12,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,347
of 174,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,310,861 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.