↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for preventing mastitis after childbirth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for preventing mastitis after childbirth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007239.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maree A Crepinsek, Linda Crowe, Keryl Michener, Neil A Smart

Abstract

Despite the health benefits of breastfeeding, initiation and duration rates continue to fall short of international guidelines. Many factors influence a woman's decision to wean; the main reason cited for weaning is associated with lactation complications, such as mastitis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 22%
Researcher 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 18%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 32 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,271,781
of 13,420,095 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,939
of 10,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,149
of 147,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,420,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.