| Title |
Treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013155.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle Roberts, Lawrence MJ Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Sivapatham Arunan, Tanjia Begum, Norman R Williams, Dana Walshaw, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Maxine Tapp, Mario Csenar, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Mexico | 1 | 11% |
| Brazil | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 37% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,980,425
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,757
of 12,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,790
of 435,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.