↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for bleeding oesophageal varices in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013155.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Roberts, Lawrence MJ Best, Suzanne C Freeman, Alex J Sutton, Nicola J Cooper, Sivapatham Arunan, Tanjia Begum, Norman R Williams, Dana Walshaw, Elisabeth Jane Milne, Maxine Tapp, Mario Csenar, Chavdar S Pavlov, Brian R Davidson, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 29%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 38%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2021.
All research outputs
#10,354,738
of 19,180,943 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,175
of 11,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,649
of 326,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,180,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.