↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005289.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Kwan, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Andrea Woolner

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 94 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 35 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 25%
Unspecified 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 40 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,041,051
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,827
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,739
of 434,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.