↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
47 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011535.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie Sbidian, Anna Chaimani, Ignacio Garcia-Doval, Liz Doney, Corinna Dressler, Camille Hua, Carolyn Hughes, Luigi Naldi, Sivem Afach, Laurence Le Cleach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Other 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 52 22%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 65 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2022.
All research outputs
#906,612
of 21,244,293 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,088
of 12,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,085
of 333,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,244,293 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.