| Title |
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie Hartmann-Boyce, Hayden McRobbie, Nicola Lindson, Chris Bullen, Rachna Begh, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Tari Turner, Ailsa R Butler, Thomas R Fanshawe, Peter Hajek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 460 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 71 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 7% |
| Mexico | 28 | 6% |
| Australia | 15 | 3% |
| France | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 13 | 3% |
| Germany | 13 | 3% |
| India | 8 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 15% |
| Unknown | 189 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 400 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 6% |
| Scientists | 26 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 102 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 468. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#58,670
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#112
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,972
of 457,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.