↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
220 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
Title
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010216.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie, McRobbie, Hayden, Lindson, Nicola, Bullen, Chris, Begh, Rachna, Theodoulou, Annika, Notley, Caitlin, Rigotti, Nancy A, Turner, Tari, Butler, Ailsa R, Fanshawe, Thomas R, Hajek, Peter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 220 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 155. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#148,229
of 17,635,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#279
of 11,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,618
of 182,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,635,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.