The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Impact of the diagnostic test Xpert MTB/RIF on patient outcomes for tuberculosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012972.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Frederick Haraka, Mwaka Kakolwa, Samuel G Schumacher, Ruvandhi R Nathavitharana, Claudia M Denkinger, Sebastien Gagneux, Klaus Reither, Amanda Ross |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Student > Master | 13 | 8% |
Researcher | 11 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
Other | 24 | 15% |
Unknown | 77 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 88 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,640,702
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,341
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,409
of 455,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.