| Title |
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013620.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chunhu Shi, Jo C Dumville, Nicky Cullum, Sarah Rhodes, Asmara Jammali-Blasi, Elizabeth McInnes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 29% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Italy | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 232 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 7% |
| Researcher | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 121 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 125 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,504,132
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,110
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,016
of 455,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#75
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.