↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
374 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007374.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Li, Hong Mei Wu, Feng Wang, Chang Quan Huang, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Guan J Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 374 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 364 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 18%
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 13%
Researcher 37 10%
Other 19 5%
Other 71 19%
Unknown 75 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 17%
Social Sciences 17 5%
Psychology 16 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 90 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,922,392
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,258
of 13,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,687
of 127,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.