| Title |
Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007374.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ting Li, Hong Mei Wu, Feng Wang, Chang Quan Huang, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Guan J Liu |
| Abstract |
Adherence to complex regimens for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is often poor. Interventions to enhance adherence require intensive education and behavioural counselling. However, whether the existing evidence is scientifically rigorous and can support recommendations for routine use of educational programmes in DKD is still unknown. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 371 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 361 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 13% |
| Researcher | 36 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 73 | 20% |
| Unknown | 72 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 131 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 5% |
| Psychology | 16 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 44 | 12% |
| Unknown | 88 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,148,915
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,615
of 12,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,477
of 113,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.