↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007374.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Li, Hong Mei Wu, Feng Wang, Chang Quan Huang, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Guan J Liu

Abstract

Adherence to complex regimens for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is often poor. Interventions to enhance adherence require intensive education and behavioural counselling. However, whether the existing evidence is scientifically rigorous and can support recommendations for routine use of educational programmes in DKD is still unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 290 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 21%
Student > Bachelor 48 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 13%
Researcher 35 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 35 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 19%
Social Sciences 18 6%
Psychology 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 47 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2019.
All research outputs
#4,863,737
of 17,351,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,356
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,118
of 159,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#53
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,351,915 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.