↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Education programmes for people with diabetic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007374.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ting Li, Hong Mei Wu, Feng Wang, Chang Quan Huang, Ming Yang, Bi Rong Dong, Guan J Liu

Abstract

Adherence to complex regimens for patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is often poor. Interventions to enhance adherence require intensive education and behavioural counselling. However, whether the existing evidence is scientifically rigorous and can support recommendations for routine use of educational programmes in DKD is still unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 334 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 20%
Student > Bachelor 54 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 13%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 66 19%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 18%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Psychology 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 69 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,825,252
of 21,301,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,371
of 12,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,789
of 175,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,301,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.