↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for mycosis fungoides
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008946.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Weberschock, Reinhard Strametz, Maria Lorenz, Christoph Röllig, Charles Bunch, Andrea Bauer, Jochen Schmitt

Abstract

Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 252 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 42 16%
Unknown 43 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 129 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 11%
Psychology 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 45 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,260,171
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,208
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,037
of 187,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.