↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for mycosis fungoides

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for mycosis fungoides
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008946.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tobias Weberschock, Reinhard Strametz, Maria Lorenz, Christoph Röllig, Charles Bunch, Andrea Bauer, Jochen Schmitt

Abstract

Mycosis fungoides is the most common type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, a malignant, chronic disease initially affecting the skin. Several therapies are available, which may induce clinical remission for a time.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 247 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 16%
Student > Bachelor 35 14%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 38 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Psychology 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 42 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2018.
All research outputs
#2,504,826
of 14,009,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,309
of 10,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,171
of 147,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#41
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,009,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.