↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Capecitabine for hormone receptor‐positive versus hormone receptor‐negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Capecitabine for hormone receptor‐positive versus hormone receptor‐negative breast cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011220.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siao-Nge Hoon, Peter Kh Lau, Alison M White, Max K Bulsara, Patricia D Banks, Andrew D Redfern

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 42 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 48 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,601,335
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,258
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,922
of 460,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#83
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.