↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002203.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W Southern, Pierre M Barker, Arturo Solis-Moya, Latifa Patel

Abstract

Macrolide antibiotics may have a modifying role in diseases which involve airway infection and inflammation, like cystic fibrosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 165 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 18%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 32 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 39 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,477,151
of 21,414,377 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,308
of 12,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,152
of 141,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,414,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.