↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
Title
Macrolide antibiotics for cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002203.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W Southern, Pierre M Barker, Arturo Solis‐Moya, Latifa Patel

Abstract

Macrolide antibiotics may have a modifying role in diseases which involve airway infection and inflammation, like cystic fibrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 206 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 56 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 66 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,768,478
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,772
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,346
of 192,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.