↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Visual or visual-tactile examination to detect and inform the diagnosis of enamel caries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd014546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Macey, Tanya Walsh, Philip Riley, Anne-Marie Glenny, Helen V Worthington, Lucy O'Malley, Janet E Clarkson, David Ricketts

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 22 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,010,770
of 21,815,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,314
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,149
of 346,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,815,602 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.