↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004011.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Awaiss Ellahi, Fiona Stewart, Emily A Kidd, Rhonda Griffiths, Ritin Fernandez, Muhammad Imran Omar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 76 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 83 53%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,310,100
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,006
of 12,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,559
of 442,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.