↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
55 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003586.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 22 14%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 62 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 11%
Unspecified 18 11%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Psychology 10 6%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 72 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#720,851
of 22,968,808 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,475
of 12,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,337
of 440,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,968,808 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.