Title |
Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003586.pub4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Verity Longley, Christine Hazelton, Calvin Heal, Alex Pollock, Kate Woodward-Nutt, Claire Mitchell, Gorana Pobric, Andy Vail, Audrey Bowen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 36% |
Japan | 2 | 5% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Philippines | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 20 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 68% |
Scientists | 8 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 230 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
Researcher | 15 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 11% |
Unknown | 115 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 11% |
Psychology | 16 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 13 | 6% |
Engineering | 5 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 8% |
Unknown | 123 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#981,657
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,957
of 12,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,138
of 453,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.