| Title |
Rooming‐in for new mother and infant versus separate care for increasing the duration of breastfeeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006641.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharifah Halimah Jaafar, Jacqueline J Ho, Kim Seng Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 26% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 2 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 357 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 53 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 121 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 84 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 7% |
| Psychology | 13 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 124 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#857,527
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,653
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,916
of 350,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.